Centre for atmospheric and oceanic sciences (CAOS)
Indian Institute of Science (CAOS), Bengalore
Introduction
Climate scientist studying aerosol–climate interactions
I am a 5th-year PhD research scholar at the CAOS,
IISc Bangalore. My research focuses on the radiative and climate effects of Methane, Black Carbon aerosols and feedback
analysis using CAM5 simulations.
Background
Work
Current projects on aerosol–climate feedbacks
Methane is the third most significant anthropogenic driver of climate change after carbon dioxide and aerosols, contributing about one-fourth of carbon dioxide’s effective radiative forcing in the industrial era. This study compares the slow climate responses to carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) radiative forcings by estimating individual climate feedbacks using radiative kernels. We use the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Community Atmosphere Model, version 5 (CAM5) and our experiments show that for comparable radiative forcing, methane forcing’s efficacy in the 10xCH4 experiment (0.90) is smaller than the efficacy of 1.35xCO2 (unity). This lower efficacy of the slow response for CH4 owing to its more negative feedback (- 1.08 W m-2 K-1) compared to CO2 (- 0.97 W m-2 K-1) is attributed to differences in lapse rate, water vapor, shortwave cloud, and albedo feedbacks.
→ Related Publication
Black carbon (BC) aerosols perturb Earth’s energy balance through strong atmospheric absorption and associated semi-direct effects, yet the climate response to BC forcing remains uncertain. Here, we quantify the equilibrium climate response to enhanced BC forcing by increasing the BC concentration by a factor of 20 and comparing it to a CO2 doubling experiment using the NCAR Community Atmosphere Model version 5 (CAM5). We find that the warming per unit ERF is smaller for BC than CO2 (~0.6 vs ~0.8 K per W m-2), implying lower efficacy. The lower efficacy is dominated by a sign reversal of the global-mean shortwave cloud feedback (-0.15 W m-2 K-1 for BC versus +0.25 W m-2 K-1 for CO2), linked to hemispherically asymmetric BC heating, a northward ITCZ shift, and associated cloud reorganization that enhances low clouds. The hemipsherically asymmetric BC heating also weakens surface-albedo feedback by limiting Southern Hemisphere sea-ice melt. Further, BC’s top-heavy warming in the fast adjustments makes lapse-rate feedback more negative. Although water-vapor and longwave cloud feedbacks strengthen under BC, they do not offset these damping effects.
→ Related PublicationScholarly Output
Peer-reviewed articles and conference papers
Recognition
Recognitions received throughout my academic career
Personal
Moments captured through my lens — nature, fieldwork, and travels
Updates
Recent activities, features, and events
Get in Touch
Open to research discussions, collaborations, and academic conversations.
Feel free to reach out via email or connect on LinkedIn for collaboration, questions, or discussions about my research.